The court refused release
Former deputy national police commissioner Shadrack Sibiya was refused bail by the Randburg Magistrate’s Court on Tuesday, 20 October 2026. The ruling means he remains in custody while criminal proceedings involving allegations of sexual offences and trafficking continue. The decision is a new development following his resignation from the South African Police Service earlier this month.
Why the magistrate said no
In delivering the decision, Magistrate Hleziphi Mkhasibe found that Sibiya had not demonstrated the exceptional circumstances required for release. The court accepted the prosecution’s concerns that he could influence witnesses or interfere with evidence if granted bail. The risk to a minor complainant was among the matters considered. These are findings for the purpose of the bail application, not a verdict on the charges.
What the allegations are — and what remains disputed
The case concerns allegations involving a 16-year-old girl and an 18-year-old woman. The charges reported by the prosecution include rape, sexual grooming, human trafficking and a firearm-related offence. Sibiya denies criminal wrongdoing. His legal team disputed the state’s account and argued for his release; the substantive allegations will have to be tested in criminal proceedings.
A separate policing scandal
Sibiya resigned on 12 October as disciplinary proceedings began, with SAPS describing the departure as a dishonourable discharge. He has also faced scrutiny in the Madlanga inquiry into alleged criminality and corruption within policing. The inquiry’s allegations and the sexual-offences prosecution are distinct matters; neither should be treated as a conviction.
What happens next
The National Prosecuting Authority said it was prepared to oppose an appeal against the bail decision if one is brought. The criminal case continues. Any further court dates, charge amendments or findings must be reported when officially confirmed. For now, the important distinction is that bail was denied, while Sibiya retains the presumption of innocence.
Sources and verification
Mail & Guardian, 20 October 2026: Source ↗
Eyewitness News, 20 October 2026: Source ↗
The Citizen, 20 October 2026: Source ↗
Associated Press, 20 October 2026: Source ↗


